0.12/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.12/0.16	% Command    : run_portfolio.sh /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.raHsLRXY18
0.15/0.37	% Computer   : n021.cluster.edu
0.15/0.37	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.15/0.37	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.15/0.37	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.15/0.37	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.15/0.37	% CPULimit   : 960
0.15/0.37	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  2 06:59:07 EDT 2020
0.15/0.37	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.37	% Running portfolio for 120 s
0.15/0.37	% File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.15/0.38	% Number of cores: 8
0.15/0.38	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.15/0.38	% Running in HO mode
0.58/0.67	% Estimated wc time : 1286
0.58/0.67	% Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 183.71428571428572
0.59/0.73	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/s6.sh running for 21s
0.59/0.76	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/new_b3.2.norw.sh running for 15s
0.59/0.76	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/b.rpo.sh running for 21s
0.59/0.77	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/s6.ds.sh running for 10s
0.59/0.77	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/c.s.2.sh running for 68s
0.59/0.78	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/c.easy.sh running for 26s
0.59/0.78	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/old_b3.avatar.sh running for 15s
0.60/0.89	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/old_sp2.sh running for 17s
0.60/0.91	% Solved by lams/new_b3.2.norw.sh.
0.60/0.91	% done 69 iterations in 0.089s
0.60/0.91	% SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
0.60/0.91	% SZS output start Refutation
0.60/0.91	tff(ax_094, axiom,
0.60/0.91	  (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),
0.60/0.91	                             wife_THFTYPE_IiioI(lCorina_THFTYPE_i,
0.60/0.91	                                                lChris_THFTYPE_i)))).
0.60/0.91	tff('0', plain,
0.60/0.91	     holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i), 
0.60/0.91	       wife_THFTYPE_IiioI(lCorina_THFTYPE_i, lChris_THFTYPE_i)),
0.60/0.91	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax_094])).
0.60/0.91	tff(ax_082, axiom,
0.60/0.91	  (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI(husband_THFTYPE_IiioI,wife_THFTYPE_IiioI))).
0.60/0.91	tff('1', plain,
0.60/0.91	     inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI(husband_THFTYPE_IiioI, wife_THFTYPE_IiioI),
0.60/0.91	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax_082])).
0.60/0.91	tff(ax_005, axiom,
0.60/0.91	  (![REL2:(($i * $i) > $o),REL1:(($i * $i) > $o)]:
0.60/0.91	     (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI(REL1,REL2) =>
0.60/0.91	      (![INST1,INST2]: (REL2(INST2,INST1) <=> REL1(INST1,INST2)))))).
0.60/0.91	tff('2', plain,
0.60/0.91	     (!!((^[Y0 : ($i * $i) > $o]:
0.60/0.91	            (!!((^[Y1 : ($i * $i) > $o]:
0.60/0.91	                   (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI(Y1, Y0) =>
0.60/0.91	                    (!!((^[Y2 : $i]:
0.60/0.91	                           (!!((^[Y3 : $i]: (Y0(Y3, Y2) <=> Y1(Y2, Y3))))))))))))))),
0.60/0.91	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax_005])).
0.60/0.91	tff('3', plain,
0.60/0.91	     (!!(($B(!!, 
0.60/0.91	          ($S(($B(S, ($B(($B(=>)), ($C(inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI)))))), 
0.60/0.91	           ($B(($B(!!)), 
0.60/0.91	            ($B(($B(($B(!!)))), 
0.60/0.91	             ($B(S, ($B(($B(S)), ($B(($B(($B(<=>)))), C)))))))))))))))),
0.60/0.91	    inference('lams2combs', [status(thm)], ['2'])).
0.60/0.91	tff('4', plain,
0.60/0.91	    ![X1 : ($i * $i) > $o]:
0.60/0.91	       (!!(($S(($B(=>, ($C(inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI, X1)))), 
0.60/0.91	            ($B(!!, ($B(($B(!!)), ($S(($B(S, ($B(($B(<=>)), ($C(X1)))))))))))))))),
0.60/0.91	    inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], ['3'])).
0.60/0.91	tff('5', plain,
0.60/0.91	    ![X1 : ($i * $i) > $o, X2 : ($i * $i) > $o]:
0.60/0.91	       (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI(X2, X1) =>
0.60/0.91	        (!!(($B(!!, ($S(($B(S, ($B(($B(<=>)), ($C(X1)))))), X2))))))),
0.60/0.91	    inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], ['4'])).
0.60/0.91	tff('6', plain,
0.60/0.91	    ![X1 : ($i * $i) > $o, X2 : ($i * $i) > $o]:
0.60/0.91	      (~ inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI(X2, X1)
0.60/0.91	       |  (!!(($B(!!, ($S(($B(S, ($B(($B(<=>)), ($C(X1)))))), X2))))))),
0.60/0.91	    inference('lazy_cnf_imply', [status(thm)], ['5'])).
0.60/0.91	tff('7', plain,
0.60/0.91	    ![X1 : ($i * $i) > $o, X2 : ($i * $i) > $o, X3]:
0.60/0.91	      ( (!!(($S(($B(<=>, ($C(X1, X3)))), X2(X3)))))
0.60/0.91	       | ~ inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI(X2, X1)),
0.60/0.91	    inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], ['6'])).
0.60/0.91	tff('8', plain,
0.60/0.91	    ![X1 : ($i * $i) > $o, X2 : ($i * $i) > $o, X3, X4]:
0.60/0.91	      ( (X1(X4, X3) <=> X2(X3, X4)) | ~ inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI(X2, X1)),
0.60/0.91	    inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], ['7'])).
0.60/0.91	tff('9', plain,
0.60/0.91	    ![X1 : ($i * $i) > $o, X2 : ($i * $i) > $o, X3, X4]:
0.60/0.91	      (X1(X4, X3) = X2(X3, X4) | ~ inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI(X2, X1)),
0.60/0.91	    inference('simplify nested equalities', [status(thm)], ['8'])).
0.60/0.91	tff(con, conjecture,
0.60/0.91	  (?[X]:
0.60/0.91	     holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),
0.60/0.91	                               husband_THFTYPE_IiioI(X,lCorina_THFTYPE_i)))).
0.60/0.91	tff(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
0.60/0.91	  (~
0.60/0.91	    (?[X]:
0.60/0.91	       holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i),
0.60/0.91	                                 husband_THFTYPE_IiioI(X,lCorina_THFTYPE_i))))).
0.60/0.91	tff('10', plain,
0.60/0.91	    ~ (??((^[Y0 : $i]:
0.60/0.91	             holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(
0.60/0.91	               lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i), 
0.60/0.91	               husband_THFTYPE_IiioI(Y0, lCorina_THFTYPE_i))))),
0.60/0.91	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
0.60/0.91	tff('11', plain,
0.60/0.91	    ~ (??(($B(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(
0.60/0.91	                lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i)), 
0.60/0.91	           ($C(husband_THFTYPE_IiioI, lCorina_THFTYPE_i)))))),
0.60/0.91	    inference('lams2combs', [status(thm)], ['10'])).
0.60/0.91	tff('12', plain,
0.60/0.91	    ![X1]:
0.60/0.91	      ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i), 
0.60/0.91	          husband_THFTYPE_IiioI(X1, lCorina_THFTYPE_i)),
0.60/0.91	    inference('lazy_cnf_forall', [status(thm)], ['11'])).
0.60/0.91	tff('13', plain,
0.60/0.91	    ![X0 : ($i * $i) > $o, X1]:
0.60/0.91	      (~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i), 
0.60/0.91	           X0(lCorina_THFTYPE_i, X1))
0.60/0.91	       | ~ inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI(husband_THFTYPE_IiioI, X0)),
0.60/0.91	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['9', '12'])).
0.60/0.91	tff('14', plain,
0.60/0.91	    ![X0]:
0.60/0.91	      ~ holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI(lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI(n2009_THFTYPE_i), 
0.60/0.91	          wife_THFTYPE_IiioI(lCorina_THFTYPE_i, X0)),
0.60/0.91	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['1', '13'])).
0.60/0.91	tff('15', plain, $false, inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['0', '14'])).
0.60/0.91	
0.60/0.91	% SZS output end Refutation
0.60/0.91	
0.60/0.91	
0.60/0.91	% Terminating...
0.61/0.99	% Runner terminated.
0.61/1.00	% Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
0.61/1.00	EOF